1/2012 Internetové sociální sítě
Tématem prvního čísla ProInflow v roce 2012 je fenomén internetových sociálních sítí (tzv. soci… » více o výzvě
1/2011 - Methodological issues in LIS and current research in the field
The first issue in 2011 is devoted to the questions on methodology and current research in LIS. What are the specifics of the methodology in information science and library studies? How to teach the methodology in the field? What research topics are currently being pursued in LIS? The next issue of ProInflow is seeking to answer these questions and many more!
Issue editor: Mgr. Ladislava Suchá (KISK FF MU)
Your papers are welcome at casopis_IV@inflow.cz
Please, read the author guidelines (see below)!
1/2011 - Methodological issues in LIS and current research in the field
2/2011 - Centralised services - the joint catalogues in new ways
The theme of the issue is support of strong centralised services (national, federative, consortial) which are about to answer an information need of a wide range of users in an efficient way. This means to be able to get anything easily, quickly and cheaply from anywhere to everywhere. It concerns both searching for a new model of the "classical" centralised services (central catalogues, national joint catalogue, document deliveries, inter-library loan service, long-term archiving of information sources etc.) and creating brand-new types of services using the most advanced technology and approaches (i.e. the semantic web).
Theme of the issue 2/2011 is tied together with a topic of the CASLIN 2011 conference. Contributions presented at the conference and shaped into form of a scholarly paper as stated in our author guidelines will be added to the issue.
Your papers are welcome at casopis_IV@inflow.cz
Please, read the author guidelines (see below)!
Reviewed scholarly papers (recommended range is 5-15 pages) present the main part of the journal's content. Papers in this section always pass through the peer-review process to ensure their high quality.
We welcome any review (in range of 1-5 pages) of any notable book from the field of Library and information studies or other fields which are close enough to the focus and scope of the journal. Reviews related to the issue's theme will be preferred.
Papers in this rubric are of a smaller range (1-2 pages), which inform our readers about the news and curiosities in LIS. As well as in the book review section, we prefer papers related to the issue's theme.
By offering a paper for publication, authors claim that the text has never been published before. If authors offer text already published elsewhere, they must inform editorial staff about this fact. ProInflow publishes original texts in absolute majority.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
More information about the licence can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/cz/. For general information on Creative Commons visit http://creativecommons.org.
Peer-review is a process ensuring the quality of scholarly papers in the main section of our journal. Original theoretical papers or papers informing about research which are about to appear in the Reviewed scholarly papers section of ProInflow are always processed this way.
Editorial board together with issue editor decide whether a paper shall be reviewed. The papers which will not be up to standard of scholarly paper shall be denied.
Starting with the 2nd issue 2011, we apply the open peerreview process. This means that the authors are informed about names of reviewers and the reviewers know who the author of the article is. Each paper is reviewed by two independent reviewers. Editorial staff and issue editor choose reviewers regarding the theme of the paper and suggest them to the journal's editorial board which may approve or disapprove them. Reviewers are not members of the editorial board and are not employees of the institution publishing ProInflow and mustn't be anyhow connected with an author (or authors) of a paper.
Reviewers may either recommend or not recommend publication of a paper as it is; they may also suggest lesser or greater modifications. In the case that alterations of a text have to be considerably large, a completely new peer-review process will take place. In the case of contradictory reviews, third reviewer is asked to judge the text.
Following the reviews' results, editorial board and issue editor decide about publication of a paper in the reviewed section of the journal. In the case that only lesser arrangements are proposed, a text is sent back to its author together with the recommendations. Author should make the recommended arrangements and the reviewer has the right to see the adjusted paper before decision on its publication is finally made.
In case of any question don't hesitate to ask us at casopis_IV@inflow.cz.